Best price guarantee 

Free tire replacement coverage 

24/7 roadside assistance 

Easy returns 

Compare

Kumho Solus HA32 vs Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) tires

Last updated 12/31/2024 - Originally published 12/31/2024
Written by SimpleTire

Kumho Solus HA32 vs Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211)

Kumho Tires and Kenda Tires are two top tire manufacturers known for their versatile and affordable range of tires designed to offer passenger and commercial vehicles a superb driving experience. Kumho Tires is a South Korea-based brand founded in 1960, a wholly-owned brand of Chinese tire company Doublestar. On the other hand, Kenda Tires is a Taiwan-based tire manufacturer founded in 1962 and started as a bicycle tire manufacturer before moving to offering great automobile tires. Both brands offer a range of tires in different categories including all-season, all-weather, all-terrain, winter, performance, and many more.

All-weather tires are designed for use throughout the year and are essentially a mix between all-season tires, and winter tires. Offering year-round traction, and driving comfort of all-season tires with the superior traction of winter tires, all-weather tires are popular among drivers looking for a single set of tires to last them year-round. Today we will look at two all-weather tires from the brands - Kumho Solus HA32 and Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211). We will take a look at some of the similarities and differences between these two tires to help you make a clear decision in this Kumho Solus HA32 vs Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) tire comparison.

Kumho Solus HA32 tires

Kumho Solus HA32

The Kumho Solus HA32 is an all-weather tire designed for use on passenger cars and offers drivers with solid wet and snow performance throughout the year. The tire is Three Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) certified for use in moderate to severe winter weather conditions and is backed by a limited manufacturer tread life warranty of 60,000 miles.

The tire features an optimized design, wide lateral groves, and 3D interlocking sipes, and is made from natural compounds to deliver solid overall performance. The Kumho Solus HA32 received an average SimpleScore of 8.7 out of 10.

Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211)

Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211)

The Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) is a touring passenger tire that can be used throughout the year including moderate to severe winter weather conditions, thanks to the Three Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) certification. Due to this 3PMSF certification, the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) goes toe to toe with some robust all-weather tires in the market and is designed for use on passenger vehicles.

Also featuring a silica-based soybean-infused rubbed compound, the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) is backed by a 60,000 miles limited manufacturer tread life warranty. Thanks to these features, the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) received an average SimpleScore of 8.2.

Kumho Solus HA32 vs Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) tires on traction

Traction is crucial for maintaining a strong grip between your tires and the road, regardless of weather conditions, ensuring you remain in control while driving. It's a key aspect of road safety, influencing your braking distance, your tire's resistance to hydroplaning, and your overall handling. The level of traction a tire offers depends on various factors, such as its tread design, pattern, and the type of rubber used, all of which combine to optimize its performance.

The Kumho Solus HA32 scored a great 8.5 in traction thanks to the 3PMSF certification and wide lateral grooves paired with 3D interlocking sipes that improve wet grip by reducing the risk of hydroplaning.

In traction, the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) received a good score of 7.7 as the tire is built with center rib sipes that bite into the road for maximum traction. Also, 3PMSF certified, the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) is sure to deliver solid traction throughout the year.

Here you can see a considerable difference between the SimpleScore of the two tires with Kumho Solus HA32 emerging as the winner.

ADVANTAGE: Kumho Solus HA32

Kumho Solus HA32 vs Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) tires on handling

Kumho Solus HA32 vs Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211)

When choosing tires, prioritizing handling is crucial because it significantly affects your control over the vehicle, especially at higher speeds. Superior handling ensures smooth maneuvering and effortless lane changes, thereby improving your overall driving experience. Several factors influence this key aspect, such as tread design, the type of rubber used, and the integration of advanced technology in tire manufacturing.

In handling, the Kumho Solus HA32 scored a great 8.8 thanks to the high-stiffness innovative tread that improves braking performance. Additionally, the tire is optimized for improved stability and features a directional tread pattern that ensures solid handling.

The Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) received a great 8.1 in handling thanks to the center rib sipes and large shoulder blocks that improve cornering and steering performance for a smooth handling experience.

Again you see the Kumho Solus HA32 taking the lead with much better SimpleScore.

ADVANTAGE: Kumho Solus HA32

Kumho Solus HA32 vs Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) tires on longevity

For drivers, tire longevity is a major priority because it determines how many miles you can get from a single set. As the tread gradually wears down, the importance of durable tires becomes clear, ensuring consistent handling and traction over time. Tread design, rubber composition, and tire construction are all critical factors in determining a tire's lifespan.

In longevity, the Kumho Solus HA32 scored an impressive 8.9 thanks to the natural rubber compound that reduces uneven tread wear. Additionally, the Kumho Solus HA32 is backed by a 60,000 miles limited manufacturer tread life warranty and comes with performance wear indicators for drivers to check the tread depth of the tire visually.

The Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) truly excels in longevity with an excellent score of 9 thanks to the silica-based soybean-infused rubber compound that reduces uneven tread wear and also boosts the durability of the tire. You can also see a mileage warranty of 60,000 miles for the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211).

Here the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) takes the lead with slightly better SimpleScore.

ADVANTAGE: Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211)

When to use each

Both Kumho Solus HA32 and Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) are all-weather tires designed to be used throughout the year in wet, dry, or heavy winter weather conditions. These tires are specifically designed to withstand all weather conditions and should be used on paved roads. Lastly, these tires can withstand warmer and colder temperatures efficiently and will offer long tread life, consistent traction, and responsive handling.

Another important thing to note here is that both the tires are certified for use in severe winter conditions and are Three Peak Mountain Snowflake certified. Hence, both tires can be reliably used in light to moderate winter weather conditions.

Which one should you choose?

Kumho Solus HA32 vs Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211)

So which all-weather tire might be the right choice for you? Well, the answer depends solely on your personal preference as both tires have their set of advantages and disadvantages. However, both tires will offer great overall performance. A few factors can help you make a decision such as the Kumho Solus HA32 scored better in traction and handling. On the other hand, the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) offers great longevity.

Another important factor to consider when purchasing a set of tires is the price. While the Kumho Solus HA32 costs around $106 per tire for the tire size 185/65R15 or $424 for a set, the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) costs $87.50 per tire or $350.00 for a set. (Note - The prices may vary depending on the tire size.)

Based on SimpleScore, you should choose Kumho Solus HA32 if you:

  • Drive a car like the Kia Forte or something like the Subaru Impreza
  • Want a tire with better traction (8.5 v 7.7) and handling (8.8 v 8.1)
  • Are willing to pay more for better traction and handling performance

Based on SimpleScore, you should choose the Kenda Vezda Touring 4S (KR211) if you:

  • Drive a car like the Honda Accord, or a Toyota Corolla
  • Want a set of tires that offer excellent longevity (9 v 8.9)
  • Want a more affordable set of tires

Still not sure which tire to buy? Fortunately, SimpleTire is here to help as our helpful agents are more than happy to assist you in selecting the right tire for your ride and budget.

Ready to find the perfect tires?

Search By